The problem is that you do not seem to accept the concept of a smart contract, where code is law.  If the code is law, then there are, by definition, no loopholes in the code.  Loopholes are another word for bug, and bug means a deviation from the action of the code and its intend.  But if the code IS the intend, no such difference can exist between the code and itself.

You also use the word "stealing money".  But playing by the rules is not stealing.  Even if the rules are not what you thought they were, because you declared them to be the sole true rules.

On the other hand, undoing the move of someone who has played by the rules (like the DAO hacker), because you don't, finally, like the rules the way you declared them, THAT is stealing.