Most people who spoke up about the Bitcoin Foundation when it was in request for comment stage were fully in support of it and by extension, of it's goals of taking Bitcoin mainstream. So forward we march.
I do think the Bitcoin Foundation is a good idea, but the person being in charge there should do that as his full time occupation, not as a 5% occupation. Seeing Vess having some many balls in the air at the same time, how can he put in the hours that Bitcoin deserve in his role at the Bitcoin Foundation ?
Yes, the Foundation definitely needs full time executive leadership. Lindsay is great, but we need like five people there. I would love to get a full time director in there that's a good fit for the Bitcoin community. I have been thinking we'd talk more about it post-conference.