Re: ❃❃ ▶▷ BETCOIN.ag ◁◀ ❃❃#Signature Campaign-High Pay, Monthly Bonus, Special Award
2) There is nothing in advertising betcoin by "normal" users that makes them a scammer.
I hate to use the word "scammer" because it usually results in a debate over the definition of the word.But, advertising for Betcoin at this point can only be due to ignorance (intentional or not) or blatant disregard for the consequences of your decisions in exchange for money.
There is no reason that someone should trust betcoin simply because some random user is advertising for them.
Imo it's not the actual signature wearing that makes this campaign worth over BTC6 a month to Betcoin. It's the way (many of) the sig campaign members will say or do anything to impress Betcoin who, in turn, rewards them with bonuses privately. It creates this false "yay Betcoin, we are #1" hype among members who are mostly not even players on the site.
3) If 2 was untrue, then there is no reason why participants should be allowed to continue to wear their signatures until the end of the payment period. You should either receive negative trust for wearing an advertisement or you don't.
I agree with you in principle, but I also think Lutpin is making the right choice on a human level by giving fair warning and allowing people to get paid and go find another more ethical campaign. If he were to just drop the hammer mid-month there would be even 10x more drama than there is now.
By throwing that "name" you just lost the game, sir 
Ok, gg then, idiot.