To me it is absolutely unfair to put a decent person like Evan Duffield on that list.
He adresses the accusations at 9:50 of this interview with Trace Mayer, audiatur est altera pars:
http://www.bitcoin.kn/2016/02/dash-lead-developer-evan-duffield-discusses-cryptocurrency-experimentation/
He adresses the accusations at 9:50 of this interview with Trace Mayer, audiatur est altera pars:
http://www.bitcoin.kn/2016/02/dash-lead-developer-evan-duffield-discusses-cryptocurrency-experimentation/
To be fair, Evan can come here and once again state his case, whereupon I may further amend the list in the OP (go see the edit now).
Evan never came here to state his case, yet you took him off the list despite the overwhelming evidence presented here on this thread.
Why do you still list people from Hashfast who have since been vindicated by the legal process (cases dismissed/terminated), yet let someone who won't show his face on BitcoinUncensored for fear of being exposed?
Former Dash pumper Tone Vays has come to acknowledge the fact Dash's instamine is Proof of Scam:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6u6aA0vUKOQ&feature=youtu.be&t=3221
Gleb, you need to learn more about the instamine:
twitter.com/Tone_LLT/status/717822927908024320
Clue up, old bean! Stop carrying water for Evan the Instaminer, or you start to look like a (mysteriously selective) scam enabler.
Still racking up the court cases i see son
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/11494936/Kasolas_v_DeCastro
Nice attempt to deflect Tone Vay's criticism of Dash's Instamine Scam by attacking-the-attacker.
Somewhere, somebody might just just be ignorant enough to believe a trivial loose end from 99% complete bankruptcy process is some kind of Gotcha! trump card supreme.
Now, back to the topic you were trying to avoid.
Why doesn't Evan Scamfield go on Bitcoin Unlimited? Why does he hide behind his marketing dept's pretty face?
And why does Gleb take such pains to avoid the obvious DASH=SCAM conclusion which Tone was easily able to ascertain?