It seems that so far, bitcoin have attracted a lot of crooks ...,
What is your definition of crooks? Some would say many politicians fit that category... What would a background check there yield? As Steve Gornick said in one thread anonymous businesses are not necessarily the most dishonest, as he lost more dealing with people with open identity (Bitconica) than anonymous businesses.
Also, nobody is vital to Bitcoin. Everything about it is interchangeable. That would be like saying we should do checks on people vital to the Internet.