Re: I do not endorse any website in my signature.<--Yes You Do!
The only posts that I have seen of yours in this thread is that the extortionist moderator Lauda has the right to advertise what he wants and if the OP disagrees with Lauda advertising for betcoin then the OP can distrust Lauda.
If the moderator is extortionist then the OP can extort him in reply as well. There is no question of betcoin
Edit: I would also note that the only people defending betcoin are those who are wearing their signature.
edit again panther. I am not.
You are prolly right but not all participants are defending betcoin as a casino, some of them are also against other people censoring them.
Who are you two to force me into anything ?
Who are you to bully me and other betcoin.ag signature campaign members with open threats?
--
I am here 5 fucking years, and i can tell you people that centralization of this forum never was worse then it is now.
Decentralization forum based on centralized trust rating network, my god. This is exactly what created this atmosphere of company shills that lurk around the
forum dealing with DT to top up their trust and to selectively choose in other people's name who's right and who's wrong, and what you should and should not say.
This is school example of extortion, so stop lying to yourself that you're the good guy here, you're not.
Who are you to bully me and other betcoin.ag signature campaign members with open threats?
--
I am here 5 fucking years, and i can tell you people that centralization of this forum never was worse then it is now.
Decentralization forum based on centralized trust rating network, my god. This is exactly what created this atmosphere of company shills that lurk around the
forum dealing with DT to top up their trust and to selectively choose in other people's name who's right and who's wrong, and what you should and should not say.
This is school example of extortion, so stop lying to yourself that you're the good guy here, you're not.