Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.
by
miningpoolhub
on 03/08/2016, 08:04:33 UTC

Back whit the new stats:


Block   Validity                        Finder   Time                             Difficulty            Amount   Exp Shares   PPLNS Sh Actual Sh Percentage
1983104   121 left   anonymous   31/07 13:36:36 (UTC)   6,788,412,609,190.00   3.750000   470,489   433,639   419,382   89.14
1983050   67 left   anonymous   31/07 13:25:51 (UTC)   6,748,783,000,230.00   9.535138   467,743   689,454   1,229,037   262.76
1982944   Confirmed   anonymous   31/07 12:59:22 (UTC)   6,791,916,886,278.00   5.000420   470,732   347,190   124,334   26.41
1982929   Confirmed   anonymous   31/07 12:56:20 (UTC)   6,781,991,708,692.00   5.001336   470,044   881,961   305,658   65.03
1982892   Confirmed   anonymous   31/07 12:49:33 (UTC)   6,745,685,955,616.00   5.001260   467,528   878,692   134,789   28.83
1982879   Confirmed   anonymous   31/07 12:46:14 (UTC)   6,755,594,623,216.00   5.000000   468,215   995,145   509,101   108.73

My speed was constant at 5 Gh/s from the 12:49 ( the block 1982892)

the out put is this one:
Block           Rewards
1983104   0.90714048
1983050   3.90881029
1982944   1.85719506
1982929   1.20797336
1982892   0.53444105
1982879   0.23113050


Sooo why do i get less rewards ?

Can someone explain to me?



(1) Pool is using PPLNS. So you get less at starting blocks, but get more from last blocks. You even get few round of rewards even you stop mining.
So your reward increases time to time, and finished smoothly.

(2) Also block reward were not same between those blocks.
Highest reward 3.90881029 at 1983050 block's reward is 9.535138, which is not usual reward 5.
90% increase. It explains why you got much more from that block.
And block height 1983104 block reward is 3.75 which is 25% less, and you got similar to that also.
Block reward is not same because of uncle blocks.


(1) PPLNS calculation and (2) block reward variation made this situation. Seems like there's nothing wrong.

Thanks.