I think the major difference in Lauda's case is that Lauda fabricated evidence (and/or utilized evidence that he knew was fabricated) in order to harm the reputation of defcon23.
The only person that harmed defcon23's reputation is he himself. His unusual overturning of his own word and the act of calumny/blackmail is what got him in this mess. What they did was irrational at best.
I think the major difference in Lauda's case is that Lauda fabricated evidence (and/or utilized evidence that he knew was fabricated) in order to harm the reputation of defcon23.
I would be interested in the "evidence" that I "fabricated". Please enlighten me.
and multiple people have excluded Lauda from their trust lists.
If by "multiple people" you mean several of your own alt accounts, then this statement is likely to be true. Why don't you say that this is your personal reaction, Quickseller? Instead of saying stuff that is obviously either false or strongly bent in order to support your stance?