Read all the
27 comments at the provided link. You can't just be lazy to read only what I commented here. I can't copy this entire linked page of comments into this thread.
There is no science of man-made global warming. Period. The comments at the linked thread are irrefutable.
Never in millions of years of cycles has temperature risen after CO2 does. Temperate always rises at least 600 years before C02 does. So C02 can't be the cause. Duh!
Al Gore lied. He didn't show his chart zoomed in.
I'm familiar with the ice core studies. I've read them. Yes, Al Gore did a lot of lying, starting with his 1988 Senate hearings, where he and a friend vandalized the air conditioners so that it was very hot during those hearings on 'global warming'. August, I think it was...
Here's one for you. There is no "scientific hypothesis" of man made global warming. There are a group of observations, predictions and premises. There may be formulated dozens of area-specific scientific hypotheses, each of which can be tested. But these are area, region or otherwise narrowly focused of necessity, otherwise they cannot be tested.
Here is a sample hypothesis.
Arctic ice melt is more influenced by soot accumulation from Asia than from increases in CO2.Whatever you think about the matter, we could all likely agree that was a testable hypothesis....
Back up to the OP: I really suspect that this post would not be allowed under the rules that Reddit now has, although to me it seems totally straightforward as a question...
Not good.
Why do you argue ?! You are right in their own way. It all boils down to the fact that the blame for global warming, are the people. More specifically, the activities of people, resulting in air pollution and the destruction of the planet Earth. It has long been known that if mankind does not stop killing planet Earth. Earth will kill mankind.