Giving a fraction of the jackpot that he was entitled to get seems fair to you? Lets say you get a fraction of your entitled signature campaign payout then what will you think about it? Will it be fair?
It doesn't matter how much they gave it to him. What matters is that they gave him some amount to shut his mouth instead of giving the jacpot that he was entitled to get. Maybe this time it was jasonort who shut his mouth what about next time?? Will betcoin.ag will continue to keep those sucking casino games and when somebody hits the jackpot they continue to give only small fraction?
The whole situation was explained many times over and over again, and if you missed some of it, i welcome you to go to
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1517648.0 and read up.
There can't be a "next one" with same situation as Jason, because rules are clear now. When someone hits jackpot now, they will be paid out if it's not from free spin, duh.
In regards to that tweet; i was participating in their twitter campaign, is that a crime ? (Oh, wait, since crypto-games is an illegal casino - It is !)
p.s. look at the thread title and op - we can continue on
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1517648.0 , before getting totally ot.
2. You have illegal unlicenced casino in your signature ad space, but that's ok,right ?
You are saying "illegal unlicenced" like it's something bad. Don't you realize that most people involved in Bitcoin don't care about government regulations?
Because there is nothing and noone who protects their customers in case they flee. Having an investment option, therefore customer funds is just another flag.