Let me get this quite straight before I have a laugh attack: You want a lot of people, ETC investors all, to sign a "petition" so the ETH hackers who stole the ETC will return what they stole? Do you even realize how funny that is? Do you think a few hundred -or thousand, or hundred of thousand- signatures will make them to reconsider and become good guys all of a sudden --assuming they are not fully convinced they have been just smarter than you and the other victims?
OK, after almost getting sick of laughing so hard, thanks for showing me that naivety still exists... to call it by it most innocent name, of course. W.O.W...
Wrong - I want DAO holders to sign the petition which basically outlines that members of the Ethereum white hat hacker team should return the 7.2 million ETC back to DAO Investors. The ETC funds held by them is currently worth 18 million dollars and this issue isn't being brought to light.
What are they planning to do with it?
Is it not that it is also theirs? The white hackers only did a service to transfer the funds so that the attacker cannot get them. Now that it is all over they want it back. Do you think they still have the right to claim what is on the old chain even though they were bailed out in the fork? They can double everything? I am now confused.
If they don't present a clear point of view people would just think they are planning to use them for themselves or something.
Is it not there funds in the first place? Being DAO holders they are eligible to have a share of the ETH stored in the DAO. Please explain why you think otherwise because I might have missed something.
the fork was done with the thought that the second chain would die fast but it is still alive.
on the "befor fork chain" the "white hat attacker " ,one name is known publicly its a memeber of the ethereum foundation, used the same way to drain the ether of the dao contract out of it . to keep it save for the holders. so no criminal could take them.
the situation now is:
ETC didnt do the roll back. what was called a theft, by the first black hat attacker ,is the same mechanism as the white hat one.
if the code is law as they dao creators say, the etc of both attacks belong to the attackers.
now the white hat attackers said we do this not to keep them we are the " goodies" we are reversing just wrongful duing.
like you say its interesting what this guys do now with it.
and its interesting to see what the original dao holders will do ?
the fork was done to deal with it once and for ever. but with the failed fork now and the 2 chains the problem is still there.
it has to be solved on the ETC chain.
let say one of the original DAO holders sue them and they know a name of the white hat attackers they have i guess a good chance to win this.
or not . becouse the code alowed it and it was on the dao page .code is lawl.
its realy an interesting case
and if one dao holder reports it might be a legal problem too.