One of the fundamental building blocks of legal laws and ethics related to economic activity is:
All parties must act in Good Faith in economic deals
Party A - Ethereum Foundation has fulfilled this requirement, by implementing a fork, too ensure Ethereum investors in "The DAO" have recovered their stolen ETH.
Good Faith e.g. recovery of stolen funds for all Parties.
Not everyone agrees with your (externally litigious) definitions of "ethics" and "stolen."
By pretending your subjective external definitions are not controversial, you commit the logical fallacy of assuming the consequent.
If that's not bad enough, your logical fallacy is then used to justify the moral hazard of bailing out the greedy and stupid, to the detriment of the wise and smart.
Shame on you. Shame!
