In Reply:
Answering silly rebuttals is making me yawn, maybe I should have gone on holiday this August
The Fork in the Ethereum blockchain is a Change
Therefore my words: "I prefer too back new innovation and discoveries" is being consistent with supporting the fork in the blockchain.
Therefore, the charge against me of logical fallacies, appears to be in somebody's imagination
Secondly the full paragraph you are quoting is:
"But, when it comes to my money and my time: I prefer too back new innovation and discoveries.
Some of these, may turn out be crap, but I'm certain their going to be winners amongst in that group."
Therefore, you comprehension is failing, because as sentence makes clear - this is not about the "Old Hat" policy of zero-bailouts, but a personal preference in trying out new features that appear in new Alts.
Turning to the guy using Latin:
argumentum ad populum= mass adoption is what every crypto currency is trying to achieve (popularity).
argumentum ad ignorantiam = ignorance requires trust, which needs history or proof of trustworthiness. Allowing 3.5 million ETH to be stolen is not going allow people to "ignorantly" trust the Ethereum Foundation and they can never achieve mass adoption of the crypto currency.
Therefore, doing the exact opposite of what you are arguing could make ETH the biggest crypto currency in world!
Answering silly rebuttals is making me yawn, maybe I should have gone on holiday this August
The Fork in the Ethereum blockchain is a Change
Therefore my words: "I prefer too back new innovation and discoveries" is being consistent with supporting the fork in the blockchain.
Therefore, the charge against me of logical fallacies, appears to be in somebody's imagination
Secondly the full paragraph you are quoting is:
"But, when it comes to my money and my time: I prefer too back new innovation and discoveries.
Some of these, may turn out be crap, but I'm certain their going to be winners amongst in that group."
Therefore, you comprehension is failing, because as sentence makes clear - this is not about the "Old Hat" policy of zero-bailouts, but a personal preference in trying out new features that appear in new Alts.
Turning to the guy using Latin:
argumentum ad populum= mass adoption is what every crypto currency is trying to achieve (popularity).
argumentum ad ignorantiam = ignorance requires trust, which needs history or proof of trustworthiness. Allowing 3.5 million ETH to be stolen is not going allow people to "ignorantly" trust the Ethereum Foundation and they can never achieve mass adoption of the crypto currency.
Therefore, doing the exact opposite of what you are arguing could make ETH the biggest crypto currency in world!