Quote from: bbc.reporter on August 08, 2016, 03:04:50 AM

Quote from: thejaytiesto on August 07, 2016, 02:45:22 PM

Quote from: Auponef on July 30, 2016, 08:19:26 AM

Quote from: raphma on July 29, 2016, 03:41:21 PM

Quote from: Auponef on July 19, 2016, 08:36:32 AM

Quote from: European Central Bank on July 18, 2016, 10:36:41 AM

Quote from: anthonydar on July 14, 2016, 10:01:43 AM

Hard fork happened in the Ethereum before. It changed from Frontier to Homestead a few months ago.

are you reading this thread? that hard fork was planned and expected and designed to improve the system, something everyone agreed on and was flagged well in advance.

this hard fork is a knee jerk reaction to a poorly designed third party app and solely designed to save asses that don't really deserve to be saved.

Most miners think there should be a hard fork.

https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4tffta/hard_fork_voting_and_node_adoption_results/?st=iqsyuhdd&sh=7457dd97

most miners? dude... YOUR source is showing us that : 9% agree - 2% says no - 88% DIDNT VOTED. eighty fuc**ing eight. how could you say most miners think there should be a hard fork???

That is how the democracy works. No vote, no say. If the non votes want to express their votes, they should vote.

Except the invention of blockchains was to get rid of the failures of democracy, and so called democracy has been a failure again as we can see with the split of Ethereum in 2 coins. Now you have the most politically influenced blockchain ever.

How is the original chain politically influenced? I thought there was no "Vitalik" in it that calls the shots. It is more anarchistic without any influence on it from one person or group. But where is the ETC community and how active are they in bringing the original chain to a better future?

If the community does not like the proposal by the Vitalik and other developers, they do not have to adopt his proposal.