I have not seen a HYIP site make profit without being ponzi.
There's nothing to suggest this one will be any different. It offers an extremely unrealistic fixed rate of return and the OP has absolutely nothing to support his claim of it being backed by trading.
Simply repeating that he is in control of a coin address which he is making payments out from isn't evidence of anything.
Still ponzi.
Again, having a wallet balance larger than total deposits completely undermines the ponzi definition:
"A Ponzi scheme (also a Ponzi game or a Ponzi) is a fraudulent investment operation where the operator, an individual or organization, pays returns to its investors from new capital paid to the operators by new investors, rather than from profit earned through legitimate sources."
How is it possible to be a ponzi scheme if more money is in the program than what has been received in deposits? The definition of a ponzi is completely opposite to this. I am definitely repeating myself, as I am responding to the same statements you are posting.