Re: SwCpoker.eu | No Banking, Only Bitcoin | Bitcoin Poker 2.0 LIVE NOW!
But, SWC has known multi-accounters playing there, like TwitchySeal. You know that feeling one gets when they walk into an underground card club and their hair instantly stands up on their arms? The feeling where one's first instinct is to find a restroom to cheek the roll before heading back out the door toward the parking lot? Well, that's the feeling I get when I see a room populated by characters such as the likes of him. I would never lay my money down on the wood as long as those types of people are lining the felt....it's just not a safe proposition. Sorry, for the lack of action, but with such a small player base, it's hard to hide the "bad actors."
Out of curiosity, what are the names of the accounts that Twitchy is multiaccounting on at SWC? Or is this just a baseless accusation? If you think someone is colluding or multiaccounting, please report it to support@swcpoker.eu. I didn't know Twitchy was playing on the new SWC. When he was playing on old Seals, there was never anything to arouse my suspicion that he was multiaccounting.
CJ doesn't have any proof of anything, he just spews whatever lies Daddy Betcoin tells him to.
Although it is ironic that he accuses others (with no proof) of multiaccounting sites:
Twitchy admitted he had multiple accounts on a single site! Was he lying? (colored text added by cjmoles)
I think you're confusing a network with a site or network skin....they are not the same thing. The WPN cited above is a whole network of different sites, many of which I was grandfathered into when the WPN absorbed skins from Merge as well as other brands....But, to be safe, I personally brought that fact up to support before I played on any alternative skins because my documents were validated by each independently. And, I more recently confirmed it with Phil on his twitch channel....their reasoning is that their software does not allow multiple accounts to be open simultaneously on different network skins....I still don't agree with the practice however. (https://www.cardschat.com/showpost2667252-post457.html)
But, that's beside the point....my point is that Twitchy does weird things and brings unwanted heat to a site....makes inaccurate claims and gets the gaming authorities questioning regulatory issues, jurisdiction, and licensing agreements....Remember the last time a bitcoin poker room had that happen to them? They had to move the whole operation and such....was bad news! I know one thing: he wouldn't be so favored unnecessarily bringing the heat to some of the underground cardrooms where I live....that's just bad ju-ju!