So that'll be a 'no' on thinking, then? Just the usual rabid homphobic ad hominem in response to the facts.

You might want to at least try thinking for the tiniest of moment while typing your contradictory sentences about how it isn't fraud because it is 'only' fraud.

So your 'Phoenix1969' has admitted he is using somebody else's account but wants to claim that it was 'given' to him by a 'friend' yet isn't offering up any evidence in that regards. How does that qualify as a reasonable response to the situation?

"Yeah I've not done anything wrong other than use a forum account somebody gave me without concern while I set about pretending to be the original owner of that account in order to ask people to send me their money"

It doesn't really get any more 'fraudy' than that! LOL.