What information was inaccurate? Betcoin's, right? Because they only implemented the rule about max bets after jasonort began to complain.
No, Twitchy lied to you there too....
Please stop making shit up about me.
The max bet rule didn't change.
They added the following to their terms:
"Bonus round and free spins do not qualify for the jackpot bonuses pursuant to casino software provider rules. Only real money rounds qualify for the jackpot bonuses."
These "software provider rules" that disqualify Jackpots during bonus rounds and freespins are not made public and likely don't actually exist.
Of course, it's tough to prove this when Betcoin ignores anyone who asks and Betsoft has a policy of not communicating with players.
I suspect whoever wrote this new term doesn't realize that many of their progressive jackpots can only be won during a bonus round.
Betcoin altered the ToS without changing the "Last updated" date to try and stealthily sneak in some rules. That's a serious problem.
The complaint was already submitted, recorded, and was being negotiated so there was no retroactive manipulation. The rules needed to be clarified so that nobody else would think that "maximum" meant "free."
JasonOrt satisfied all requirements for the progressive jackpot according to the rules at the time.
They changed the rules retroactively and did not pay him the jackpot.
Maximum means the greatest or highest amount possible. JasonOrt bet highest amount possible for the denomination specific jackpot. In other words, he bet the maximum.
I don't have all this free time to engage in weird debates, gamble, and do whatever I feel like because I'm dumb and poor....
Just because you're dumb and poor now doesn't mean you will be forever. I believe you are capable of creating a less dumb future for yourself where you enjoy a less poor lifestyle. I hope you do.
https://www.casinolistings.com/forum/gambling/online-casinos/28043/questioning-betsoft-jackpots?page=1"Good Girl, Bad Girl" is designed to function within those distribution frequencies
When you make a claim like this, you should explain how you know it to be true. Otherwise, it would be silly for anyone to believe you.
....If you dig a little deeper, you'd realize that it's not like other games....the jackpots are mutually exclusive by design.
Each denomination has 2 independent jackpots. You can't win them both in a single spin. This means they are mutually exclusive.
Is that what you meant? I think you might be confused.
It's really nothing unique for a game to offer multiple proggressive jackpots. Most of the time, these jackpots are "mutually exclusive". It's just another way of saying you can't win more than one jackpot in a spin.
At the copa offers 3 progressives. You can't win more than one in a single spin. They are mutually exclusive.
PartyPoker offers "The BigOne" slots. It's 5 independant progressives. You can't win more than one in a single spin. They are mutually exclusive.
Any time you see a "Mini" "Medium" "Max" type progressive game, they are almost always mutually exclusive.
lol^^^