the player has the option of choosing which jackpot to play which also eliminates the possibility that the other jackpot could be won. And, if one or the other jackpot is such that it has a higher expected return than the other, then that's the one that will be chosen. Once it's chosen, the other jackpot cannot be won.
CJmoles thinks the reason one jackpot is never won is because everyone chooses to play for the other jackpot instead.
Anybody with half a mutant brain cell would choose the mode that had the highest jackpot....Especially those who are spending thousands of dollars in max bets to hit the jackpot. If you had a choice to spend 5 to win 10, or 5 to win 5000.....would you still choose to spend 5 to win 10?
people were playing in "Bad Girl" mode because the jackpots were higher.
Players had the choice to play in the mode which they thought would be most profitable to them and when they did that it excluded the possibility that the other event could occur
people were playing in "Bad Girl" mode because the jackpots were higher.
Players had the choice to play in the mode which they thought would be most profitable to them and when they did that it excluded the possibility that the other event could occur
He thinks everyone just picked whichever mode had the highest jackpot, resulting in the other mode never hitting.
Cj, How do you explain the smaller jackpot (the one nobody is choosing) getting hit over 100 times while not a single person wins the big jackpot that everyone picks?
My theory is that most people both ways, good and bad, at the same time and contribute to both jackpots with every spin.
When the bonus is triggered, sometimes they choose bad, sometimes they choose good.
Someone who's up a lot of money is more likely to choose bad, someone who wants their money to last is more likely to choose good.
Most players will check it out each, "just to see"
It's pretty funny to see all the different ways you try to defend a casino that doesn't even bother trying to defend themselves.
Any thoughts on the whole "this issue is between the player and a business that refuses to communicate directly with players and nobody knows who runs it or owns it?
Wouldn't it be funny if it was the same people that owned Betcoin?