You're on the right track Cjmoles!  Finally!

Something is obviously wrong.

One possibility is that the data was faked not accurate due to human error. <---(smile) data source citation?

If the data is accurate though, then there is a serious issue with Betsoft software. <--- (smile again) or the data source.

Have you seen this article?  I somehow missed it.

I seen the article....It is obviously using secondary sources such as the flawed statistical analysis provided by casinolistings.com and the bitcointalk thread which is untruthful.

I think the author did a really great job of articulating Betcoins ethical responsibility in the "WHO PAYS?" section. <--of course you do

But, the jackpot wasn't actually won as claimed in the bitcointalk thread....the dispute was whether or not the terms were clear....The jackpot never dropped and Betcoin did, immediately, pay the 1000 credits that were won. Who's responsible for interpreting the intent of the code....a random TwitchyTroll or the software provider?

For reference, here's case law on who has responsibility in similar cases: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/la-court-of-appeal/1080167.html#footnote_ref_1  Footnote 1 reads: "A progressive slot machine is a machine that is linked by computer to similar slot machines in other casinos.  Each linked slot machine contributes money from that machine to a single jackpot, which is called a progressive jackpot.   The progressive jackpot is much larger than any jackpot a single slot machine could pay.   Often the manufacturer of the progressive slot machines is the owner of the machines and is responsible for paying the progressive jackpots that are won.   In the instant case, IGT manufactured and owned the Wheel of Fortune slot machine and was responsible for paying any progressive jackpots won on that machine."


--snipped TwitchTroll trash for brevity--