Cj, How do you explain the smaller jackpot (the one nobody is choosing) getting hit over 100 times while not a single person wins the big jackpot that everyone picks?
That is very strange, indeed, if nobody picks it, yet it is won over 100 times! It doesn't seem like it it should be won at all if it wasn't played....Something's obviously wrong with that data too.
Do you think there's any possibility that these two graphs are accurate or no? I have no idea what those graphs are, or where they came from because you do not cite a source; therefore, I cannot give you an opinion on the accuracy of the data.
---snipped TwitchyTroll trash because sources not cited----
Where in the data does it demonstrate that the jackpot was won while nobody was playing? It is an impossibility for that to occur, and I haven't seen any study that made that claim. See, it's not the data that is wrong....it's the source of information that is wrong. So, find the person who is claiming that the smaller jackpot was won over 100 times while nobody was playing, and ask him to present the data and cite the source.
And, the odds against hitting the "Bad Girl" jackpots are much greater than the odds against hitting the "Good Girl" jackpots; that's why the smaller, "Good Girl," jackpots were hit most often. Furthermore, nothing in the data demonstrates that everybody was playing for the larger jackpot; in fact, the data shows quite the opposite; there were MANY people playing for the smaller, much easier to trigger, "Good Girl" jackpots, and fewer players playing for the larger, much harder to trigger, "Bad Girl" jackpots. See Table Below
