I'll refute your off the mark comments and ignore the inferences posed as questions.

The newness of the algo is not an issue--if the coin does the most with that algo (ct development, strongest network, ect,) the coin it was forked from has lost first mover advantage, so becomes a non-issue.

The coin is more anonymous than any other (no coin ATM is NSA proof) and continually working to strengthen its anonymity with measures like ct and kovri development with I2p--I think you are making the mistake of most people when they talk about fungibility when describing it as yes/no, on/off, either you have it or you don't--this is wrong in both cases as they happen in degrees. Can't really keep people from thinking in only binary terms, but I can certainly tell you that it shows a lack of insight or nuance in your conception cryptocurrencies, and you'd be good to learn how to judge these technologies in a nuanced way--though that takes some work, I'm sure it would be worth your time.