Guys, the name is good and it probably deserves to be revived. No matter if the guy who started the thread is bagholding.
Thanks for the positive encouragement! I believe it does need revived.
The amount of early adopters who have actually lost a small fortune by scammers really dont deserve to be dumped on and to be supported in being able to grow their chosen platforms.
Funny really, Bitcoin is probably the most stolen coin in circulation, yet everyone is still trying to make it successful. Ultimately if people are beginning to choose between individual coins and not choosing to invest in ensuring the broad bulk of coins, invested in by people old and new, then it is selfish and does not serve to help their individual investments. For that attitude those who are "bagholding" bitcoin deserve to lose 90% of money when the coin values realign and people can buy many altcoins directly with fiat.
The Paycoin blockchain has been going for some time, it has a history (somewhat chequered like Bitcoin), however I believe it has a purpose and that is it is a good brand to work with. I do think it is unfair for people who have quite possibly earnt their money through crypto but do not continue to support the growing infrastructure and coins.
I am not a bag holder, I only have 125,000 coins, thats not many really, and there is plenty that can be done with the existing chain to ensure future operations.
The amount of shitcoins that still come out day by day, Bithire for example, that actually do have an interesting and appealing metrics, once again leaving people high and dry with early investments, I just think that its rather rude of people to be derogatory, as with many other peoples posts here, just because they have perhaps made their money and are sitting pretty in crypto land.
Anyway, my proposal is to somehow develop Paycoin, if people don't think it has commercial value, then more fool them, perhaps they have never even heard of "Pay"pal? Never mind.....
Bitcoin was not created by a "serious in vest" buffoon for the purposes of covering up a previously failed ponzi scheme. Being stolen has nothing to do with that. Being a scam coin by intent has everything to do with that.
XPY a shitty coin whichever way you look at it - clone of an outdated code base, barely functioning wallet, no distinguishing features other than inflation, Garza's minions probably still holding millions of coins waiting to dump on you, and yes, a tarnished name on top of it.
I would like to say you're deluded but most likely you're just a fucking scammer like the rest of them. But how about this: you develop a new wallet, maybe even fork it to a fresh start, and see how that goes. Build it and they will come, right? Instead of looking for someone else to do it for you and spreading nonsensical rationalizations of this proven scam.