Personally I wouldn't even worry about this hurting anything/anyone except for the posters themselves .. Yep a bunch of noobs with some buthurt agenda. Speculating on what could happen before it has happened is just that ~ speculation. Evidence zero, points zero, ICO=scam in weight also zero. Thanks for trying, but not good enough 
Edit: Nothing in op is evidence of anything ~ just speculations. If you think that is evidence then you have a few holes in your education ..
Edit: Nothing in op is evidence of anything ~ just speculations. If you think that is evidence then you have a few holes in your education ..
If the dev team was real, they would prove it. Ask him why they won't simply prove it and dispel all this fud! He will give you an excuse that doesn't make sense. Like he has done so far.
What kind of dev team would refuse to talk to the community and investors during their own ICO? Frank is a fake profile.
If Frank was real he could make a 20 second video and shut down 50% of the fud in an instant. We already know what he looks like from his picture so claiming he wants to stay anonymous isn't a valid excuse.
Wassermans other excuse is that, they won't post a video or interview because they already decided they won't post a video or interview. Circular logic.
Like I said, most of these accounts are from noobs because we are the ones dumb enough to fall for this ICO. If you took time to read all of my questions, and wassersmans responses, you would be pretty convinced as well.
If you did invest, then why didn't you voice everything that you are voicing right now at the very start before you invested? This part makes no sense to me at all ..