It's correct that I did PM you about your decision to advertise Betcoin.AG & that I had suggested for you to remove that advertisement and search a different advertiser for your signature space.
yes, the first motion came from my side
The reason I suggested you to make contact with ACE is, that they are the only current example of people operating under a custom rate I currently have
I'm glad we can agree on this.
I'm sorry that I didn't directly include these links in my PMs, if they could have changed your reaction.
Yes, typically when you allege someone is a scammer, you provide evidence, or a link, or something... The owner of the signature campaign had no negative trust (but left the campaign shortly after our agreement due to harassment), and the user who supposedly got scammed appeared satisfied with the end result. Clearly I must have overlooked something, as I don't see why you would continue to wage war against Betcoin if the only complaint against them isn't even a current complaint by the user who made it. Perhaps if you had actually made a legitimate case instead of telling me what to do, I would have come to a different conclusion on this issue.
You agreed to add a rule to your signature auctions which gives you the option to remove/deny advertisers based on their reputation, or lack therof.
Yes, I did. I also said I would look into options for removal of the signature, but I wouldn't do it unilaterally without first discussing the issue with my advertiser. As you can clearly see, I've been wearing a different signature for days now. I also suspended my posting during this period and made this known. I noticed none of the quotes from me saying what I have done made it into any public thread, even though I was in that same chat asking people what else I could do that would be fair to everyone.
You're right, you have not posted any personal messages, may it be from slack or this forums PM function.
I did
While you may not see this as an offense, it certainly effects how much I trust a person if they can't keep personal conversations out of the public eye.
You were looking into ways of releasing the dox of a person that you were believing to harass you.
I, aswell as others, made the asumption
Looking into ways to release your dox? This was a bad assumption. Worse than my allegations actually, as this would be a punishable offense and didn't involve any misinterpretation on anyone's part.
As I previously explained to you, direct messages had failed, hence I stopped trying.
You stopped trying before this drama unfolded? That makes no sense. The last message I received from you was on August 1st. So if your version of, "I did everything remotely possible" means not sending me a message for 18 days while you left negative trust and started a thread to bash my reputation with false DOX claims, then I would agree.
I can't apologize for things I didn't do.
This is an unfortunate stance. You do realize that you are literally openly paying TwitchySeal for posts he makes bashing me? When you learned he was harassing me, why wasn't your response that you would look into removing him from your payroll?
I'm sorry this situation has been taken this far.
I'm also sorry for the things I made public. I was in a position where I felt cornered and this thread has been a desperate move
By taking it this far I assume you mean your creation of this thread with false allegations and you leaving me negative trust instead of sending me a message to try and work out this dispute?
If you'd like to discuss the issue, I'm certainly willing. After all, while your goal of getting me to remove the signature has been accomplished, I am still yet to see the end of this harassment and mud slinging, which was my goal.