You seem to be misunderstanding this situation. As far as I know Mitchell and RHavar aren't friends, and my removal of trust of Mitchell (didn't happen by the way) shouldn't have had any effect on RHavar as Mitchell is already in the default trust network, so I don't understand why people are trying to paint this as a threat when there were no potential negative consequences for RHavar whatsoever.
Well, the first thing I did when I got your message was ask Mitchell to remove me from his trust, because the last thing I wanted was for him to be disadvantaged in any way (even if he stayed in the the default trust). Of course I'd feel bad if my actions (or lack of them) caused any harm to someone who obviously didn't deserve it. I'm just guessing here, but I can imagine that in his role on the forum it's important for him to be out of drama and stay a widely trusted person (which he completely is), so it'd be quite unfair to drag him into this mud.
And I suspect you realized that this would be the most effective deterrent to get what you wanted. It's not exactly like you could give me negative rep (for what? Not wanting to remove a banal trust feedback without evidence?), or excluding me directly would have any use. Instead you promised to do something that amounts to collective punishment (if we want to get all dramatic) unless I helped you make TwitchySeal's account red.
Now, I'm willing to accept I completely misunderstood your intentions, but I'm used to treating things in the form: "Do what I want, or I'll do something I know you won't want" as extortionistic. And I would think that you as an otherwise reasonable person would be able to see why I could have interpreted your message that way, instead of continuing to defend it and try imply I have ulterior motives for spinning it.
Also I note that Stunna had also left twitchyseal positive feedback a couple months after me, specifically related to the betcoin.ag incident:
Did you also go to efforts to have him excluded from your trust network too?