Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)
by
suchmoon
on 22/08/2016, 12:08:35 UTC
You are truly moronic, and especially after the upstanding things I heard about you in the past, I have no respect for you now.

And " If the ION team would happen to amaze us with technological innovation, transparency, business execution - that's what we would discuss here."

You would not have the balls (sic) to change your ways and thinking when the products are delivered so please do not try to pull the perverbial wool over my eyes.

You're missing the point my friend. Even if I removed ION from the title and went on a sabbatical to travel around the world - that wouldn't make the whole ionomy thing any more successful. This thread, or what I think, or the size of my sick balls doesn't make or break the project, just like it didn't for Garza. Who by the way was also very unhappy about the discussion here, so go figure.

Suchmoon I do respect the work you've done over the years, gathering so many pieces of evidence and proving A+B that Garza is a scammer and as Allen stated on several occasion, your contribution is by far the most valuable one and thanks to you, has enabled GAWsuit to collect enough evidences for it's case.

However, I agree with Krumz on that one! ION has nothing to do with XPY anymore and should not be listed in that thread.

Apart from the fact that Krumz & XPYTeam have spent a considerable amount of time and personal ressources trying to revive a coin in which they believed, they shouldn't be linked with Garza anymore. All of them got scammed by him and this doesn't make them complicit, quite the contrary!

Time has proven that:

  • all members of the now defunct TeamXPY had not link with Garza
  • most of them are members of GAWsuit and are all looking forward to the day when justice will be done.

Krumz got a bit excited and didn't moderate his "French" but this doesn't make him a bad guy. Anyone would probably react the same way if you get repeatedly throw into the mud....

Krumz is entitled to his opinion and is welcome (despite some posters claiming otherwise) to voice it here with as much French as he wants, as long as it's on topic.

I'm not gonna repeat myself - here is why I added ION the title of this thread and why it doesn't automatically mean it must be a scam:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857670.msg15993693#msg15993693

You might also want to take a look at the origin of this thread and you'll see that these are similar types of questions that were raised two years ago:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=720844

tl;dr: It's not so much some kind of physical association but mostly the behavior patterns that make ION a notable successor to XPY et al.

Not trying to raise a dispute here but genuinely trying to understand some of the following accusation:

Quote from: Phildo
You realize that team ion is lead by a man who is currently business partners with one of the main culprits in enabling the GAW scam to rope on as many people as it did, right?

Who are you referring to and can you please provide facts?

I'm guessing Matlack and Mordica:

http://prestigeauditing.com/about-the-owner/

Quote from: Phildo
...collecting the xpy to start definitely puts them together.

Have they not burned all the collected XPY? If not can you prove it?

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xpy/

11+ million still outstanding. It was claimed that 10 million (out of 16 million in existence at that time) where exchanged into ION so only ~5 million have been burned and they didn't even publish the addresses for the other 5 million.