You can start with SSRN and then the Journal of experimental social psychology (ISSN: 0022-1031), Personality and social psychology review (ISSN:1088-8683), Journal of personality and social psychology (ISSN: 0022-3514), Experimental Economics (ISSN: 1386-4157).
Finally, I invite you to read this article published in Science:
http://www.ucd.ie/geary/static/publications/workingpapers/gearywp200935.pdfHave fun.
I just noticed this edit. From that paper:
For example, if a firm pays a higher wage or a subject provides higher effort, costs are higher and final earnings are lower.
This type of thinking is exactly what I am talking about. "Higher" this, "Lower" that. Its 50-50 all the way. The falsified hypothesis is one of zero effect of A on B. In social science A always affects B in some way, so that hypothesis is worthless. This is what makes it not really "science", the data may be good, but the way it is interpreted is not scientific. No matter how many confounds there are it should be possible to estimate some interval of the result of A on B that can be narrowed over time as more data is collected. This does seem common in the social sciences for whatever reason.
Have you ever seen a social science experiment replicated exactly?
Note: this all goes for biomedical science as well. The only difference is it is often easier to control confounds.