Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] ION [ION] | ICO LIVE | PoS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!
by
suchmoon
on 25/08/2016, 01:30:39 UTC
lol, bittrex doesn't like this, polo either, only yoshit likes your ion. How much fund you have raised from ico?


Total amount of BTC raised from ION ICO: 363.79 BTC



Just to give some context.

363 BTC x 500$ = 181500$
181500 / 0.225 avg ico price = ~800 000 ion bought on ICO

Currently ~135 masternodes x 20000 = 2 700 000 ion.
Let's add 10% for ions not fully in masternodes, very rough total: ~3 000 000 active ions.

I assume those ICO btc go into development. I think a week back it has been said ico btc were not touched yet.

Just to show you the risk besides the potentials of owning a masternode.

No investment advice.

Good point. There are also 1.25 million coins exchanged to XPY. Those went into stakers but 3-month stakers already expired, right? Were there 6- or 12-months ones?

In any case, without full accountability of every coin issued during the ICO it's impossible to prove anything. Three months into this clusterfuck I'm struggling to find any plausible reason for its ridiculous opacity other than intentional obfuscation.

you ignored my main point. i will accept your numbers to illustrate a point which is to say that its intellectually dishonest to say: you have bitcoin blockchain and ion blockchain... connect the dots people

I think you missed my point that the number can be produced from other data available to me other than addresses from the block chain... This number is only a very close approximation of the number derived from data taking weekly from the time of ICO. I'll add a disclaimer that there could be an error in my calculations...

The presentation of this data does not mean I would provide the addresses for ICO. You are barking up the wrong tree!!!

Let me guess, your "data" is what the nice guys told you and of course you trust them because... well, they're nice.

We've seen the numbers. They mean jack shit, in fact less than that because throwing such numbers around and blatantly refusing to show what should be a simple copy-paste of a Bitcoin address has only one logical explanation.