Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Blocking the creation of outputs that don't make economic sense to spend
by
johnyj
on 10/03/2013, 01:56:01 UTC
I just browsed through some old discussions and found this:

Re: Flood attack 0.00000001 BC
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=287.msg7524#msg7524

It seems to do more harm than good because it prevents micropayment implementations such as the one bytemaster is suggesting.
Bitcoin isn't currently practical for very small micropayments.  Not for things like pay per search or per page view without an aggregating mechanism, not things needing to pay less than 0.01.  The dust spam limit is a first try at intentionally trying to prevent overly small micropayments like that.

Bitcoin is practical for smaller transactions than are practical with existing payment methods.  Small enough to include what you might call the top of the micropayment range.  But it doesn't claim to be practical for arbitrarily small micropayments.