So all this shit aside, good SP is finally trying to make a long term solution here... There is literally no one else doing this except Claymore. Funny all the people bitching about fees. I do agree though that dev fee and flat fee combined are kind of silly though. The whole reason for a miner fee is for long term support and so you can get all the smaller miners in there as well.
A lot of people are now running 1070s. You probably wont see that many people purchasing this till there is some headway made with those units.
Well, you're surely one of them, you possess at least 80 gtx 1070
You forget many others, like tpruvot and wolf (lbry).
The main issue is that there's a general statement about the new miner capabilities, but is it confirmed by third party? What amount reaches a 970 at 1478MHz with the sp "ultimate? 1?
I am curious to see the new results mainly on the pascal architecture, because of maxwell right now isn't so useful. It could have a month ago on lbry, right now it's mediocre in average. A 980ti heavy overclocked have got a power consumption in the 260W range, if not more, so the efficiency (MH/W) goes down, and so the main reason to buy a "faster" kernel.
If there will be released a public version with a fee on it, hopefully not more than 2% like claymore, I"ll make an article about the MH/W ratios, with tpruvot 1.7.8, 1.8.1 and the new kernel.