So let me get this right,
IF we'd all upgrade to .08 then the blocksize restriction would have been lifted, but because not many did we now have a fork and because the 0.7 blockchain is longer we should revert to that until a proper upgrade path to 0.8 is made available?
so is 0.8 inherently flawed, I thought there was a consensus that the blocksize should be lifted? I think this is very poor
A simple retards guide summing up key points for and against blocksize restriction or lifting should have been stickied in the forum for some time and a poll taken by everybody not just miners, devs and long time posters.
An upgrade should have been built and tested on an isolated blockchain if that is possible,
A announcement about the upcoming availability of the upgrade should have been stickied referring to the poll results and post aforementioned,
A target date and block number should have been specified and downloads of the new client should have been made available along with an "alert£"
Some time before the specified date / block another last chance alert should hav been issued, anyone not upgrading after the date / block should have been left in the dust.
0.8 did not lift the blocksize. The block being big is just a specific problem, it could have been a block too small or too strange (the problem was, however, that the block was very bigbut not "too big"). The problem was 0.7 and below rejecting a block that should have been accepted.
0.8 is not flawed. The flaw lied in 0.7 and below. If an upgrade was hastened, the problem would not have been a problem at all.