No - first you need to understand people, more precisely investors. Same guys as you need them more in ICO.
I can agree more money is needed, but show me the costs planned and justification. Professional business approach.
Also I repeat:
What you win by discussion and going for compromise is:
- respect
- less complaining
-
trust, as you prove you treat investors seriouslyWhat invetors need:
- not freezing the price for 10 weeks so low
- not diluting funds so much
- trust/discussion
People need to understand that this ICO could be a flop in terms of BTC raised, why is everyone seeing the MAX BTC allowed as what the outcome would be? dPoW from my understanding could cost up to about 500 BTC a year, will you be funding that?
James did not hold a ICO for btcd so who are actually investors?
He is a person that has no obligations to BTCD. He is free like anyone to walk away at any time and not offer this swap.
So before anyone thinks about dilution or the lack of a short term pump, think about a devless coin that has the same tech as any other alt coin.