I would advise doing what CLAM did, just distrubute it equally to everyone that has a btc address with minimum amount of x coins. This way the rich wont get richer and the poor wont get more poor.
That was my initial idea, even before I learnt about CLAM, I dropped the idea because this way of distribution is
passive.
What do you mean by "passive"?
I'm a supporter of this idea but the real problem could be whales just splitting up their wallet into many others..
Yes, that's a real problem, and from what I've seen, most attempts to build something egalitarian are vulnerable to fraud and abuse.
By passive I mean that users don't need to get involved in any activity, here and now. Value is created by human activity, which CLAM fails to incentivize, you can claim your clams now or in 10 years when and if it gets real value (it won't), and it'll be the same number of clams.