https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/CoinJoinCan you please tell me main differences?
For me it seems you guys are doing exactly this. (Bolded in your text)
Also can you please explain the last Bolded part in more detail please? I'm not quite sure what you mean with it.
Thank you for your time.
-snip-
Hello package,
Thanks for your answer even though I don't really think you understood me.
So as far as I understand you use two block chains and the second blockchain obfuscate the address of the receiver via encryption.
The second blockchain has nodes that has a certain amount of Nav pooled.
The second blockchain does a mixing like coinjoin/dash mixing etc pp.
I see no difference except it seems the mixing works on the blockchain instead on a single server (coinjoin) but very similar to master nodes (dash).
Correct?
Hey package,
That was my reply you didnt see.
Hi,
No, not correct like you said. Dash masternode is building a chain of sendings where in the end the tx got send in small chunks to the recipient. But all happens on the same chain and is "traceable". With much affort, of course.
Coinjoin is on a server where you want to send like 2 bitcoin to a person. You send like 3btc and get back 1 while the server sends 2 to the person. I hope i understand that correct. But at the end i think so...
We are using a different system, using a Subchain to transport sending information from one node to a random other node. Using this we break the information on the nav blockchain. There is no transaction between you amd receiver, which can be traced, since the recipient do not get the coins you did send.
So it is not a mixing service. Have you read the original whitepaper? It is quite good explanation in there.
Google navajocoin whitepaper and the decentralization whitepaper.
Regards
Shahim
Edit: reading your last posts make me think you are German. Ich denke auf deutsch kann ich eine bessere Erklärung geben, wenn du magst per pm.