Why does it seem like you're intentionally overlooking the bullshit Xiao has spewed over tha past couple days?
You seem to be a Betcoin player, so you're most likely aware of all the bullshit they've pulled as well. Why are you here defending them? (or am I missing something?)
Why is games-protect getting all the hate?
Do you believe Betcoin is raking over 75 coin per month? (Xiao says his sign ups alone have been)
Do you believe that Xiao doesn't make his income off sports/casino losses because his 500+ sign ups only play poker?
How do you feel about Xiao helping Betcoin to cover up the BBJP issue, the overcharging rake and underpaying rewards for months and countless other issues?
How about Betcoin intentionally quoting fake skyped logs from Ajundftd of me "admitting" to ddos them?
@TwitchyClassic Twitchy. When someone has a different opinion than you, the person must be a shill for X or Y.
On Xiao.If you think I am siding with Xiao, I have no side but only the poker players one.
I suggest you to read again the 1st part of my post where I suggest Betcoin to give other Affiliates the same deal as Xiao for Poker.
I suggest you to read as well my posts on the old Xiao BTCTalk thread.
All of your questions concerning Xiaos personal deal have nothing to do with the poker players. It does not matter how much he has on Casino/Sportsbook, how much he makes and so on.
As I said once again in my post, players can be disappointed that he has no pull on Betcoin policies considering his special relationship. And I have been myself quite a critic towards him for that. But past that, you just have to treat him as your random poker affiliate.
What does it mean ? At the end of the day for the poker players the only question is: does this affiliate deliver on what he is offering ?
The Answer is: yes.
You can talk about the Ungod case, where Ungod said he was shorted by Xiao on his RB. But Ungod said publicly that his issue with Xiao has been resolved.
I can say that I have not been shorted on my RB by Xiao and the only times I had not the right amount it was a Betcoin issue (easy to prove: your rake * 5 = VIP Status points, if =/= then something is wrong).
That does not mean it is true for everyone, but like I said the only case I can think of is Ungods and he said himself that it was resolved.
On Betcoin.I am Vae Victis there.
I have raised my voice in public on a lot of different Betcoin issues and I have even been censored on their forum for that.
I have nothing to prove and even less lessons to receive from you on that front.
On game-protect.The guy is an obvious crook.
He is offering a poker player protection for money/affiliations: do you really think he is able to deliver it ?
The fact that youre willing to softball this guy is mind-blowing.
@game-protect.I am not aware that "Player Protection" add Game Protect affiliate links to his posts, please quote?
________________________________________
Curacao license 1668/JAZ scam, 100 questions from The Hague
THE HAGUE, WILLEMSTAD The government in Curacao must answer all questions from the Parliament in The Hague about the gaming sector on the island. That is according to a majority of the Second Chamber of the Dutch Parliament.
The Minister of Kingdom Relations Ronald Plasterk has to send more than 100 questions asked by Dutch MPs to the Curacao government. Most of these questions come from the MP for the Socialist Party Ronald van Raak.
Van Raak indicated that he doesnt like the answers he received from Plasterk. The MP now has the support of the ruling party VVD and the Labour Party PvdA to have the government in Willemstad answer these questions.
Van Raak believes that the gambling sector in Curacao is illegal and that the public company UTS is involved in it. He also believes that the KPMG is supporting UTS in this business.
Recently asked questions from van Raak about the Curacao gambling industry
1) Is it true that the construction of master and sub-licenses in the gambling industry used on Curacao has no legal basis?
2) Is it true that UTS as casino licensee shall not report unusual transactions to the MOT?
3) Is it true that the online casino network UTS also facilitates the use of (master-) licensing, Internet licensing, logo, marketing, and other turnkey services including colocation, e-zones services, legal and compliance services, corporate services, fiducary services, IT infrastructure and support, telephone, leased lines and internet infrastructure, gaming software, banking, card payment and authorization services?
4) Does the UTS (master-) licensee fulfill its responsibility for tax payments from its casino network?
5) Is it true that the service KPMG provides for UTS include legal, tax and financial advisory services, management consulting, marketing and sales operations, responsible for internal reporting and is for more than 15 years checking accounts?
Source: Game Protect
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showpost.php?p=50758305&postcount=3738In before: Player Protection (aka game-protect) is only giving his source (which happens to be his own affiliate site).
By the way you did copy/paste the same post under your "real identity" on PFA.
http://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/showthread.php?13240-Curacao-License-1668-JAZ-gaming-company-owe-you-money&p=582453&viewfull=1#post582453I find it very unprofessional from legal expert IHasTehNutz to give his legal assessment about Game Protect without any prior research. And he of course did not make any research afterwards. His sole intend was to bad mouth and attack Game Protect!
IHasTehNutz has spent countless hours on the Locke case but yeah, his hidden agenda is only to bad mouth and attack Game Protect !
I find it very curious that you link from my thread to this betcoin.ag scam thread, instead of posting your nonsense about me directly in my thread?
Nothing curious about that. I said what I think of you in your own thread and I link the people one of my post about you so that people can have the context.