The blocksize is too big if it does not allow for users to run their own nodes in a decent computer. It's as simple as that.
It's not as simple as that. What does "not being allowed" to run nodes on a decent computer mean? I've seen a lot of people throw around words without actually backing them up with specifics. Does this imply a lack of storage space, an inadequate internet connection/bandwidth, not being able to validate on time? I do recall a presentation where the potential of 'never being able to catch up' as a new node as presented (I think this was Hong Kong Scaling 2015).
lol funny to see that now that core are saying yes to 4mb. lauda has done a complete 180 change from his old rhetoric of 2mb is too much.
come on lauda. are you going to atleast admit your last year of tripe was just propaganda and misinformation to sway your flock to stick with the scheme to make bitcoin more controlled.
where is all the 2mb wont work on a RasPi now? (evaporated as soon as core wanted BIG BLOCKS)
where's all your 1mbit/sec internet (75mbyte per 10min) is not fast enough for 2mb? (evaporated as soon as core wanted BIG BLOCKS)
where is all of your "the internet cant cope", (while millions are livestreaming HD gaming)? (evaporated as soon as core wanted BIG BLOCKS)
where is all of your doomsday prophecies? (evaporated as soon as core wanted BIG BLOCKS)
oh wait. now you been spoon fed from your controllers, you now want to pretend it was never a problem, even after a year of saying it was a problem.
oh well it only took you a year to wake up.