Go ahead, bury your head in the sand. That is the normal response from morons who don't want to see anything other than their own stupid ideas on matters.
False. I'm very open to ideas, this one is just idiotic. It is you who's the ignorant fool trying to push through a catastrophic ideology. Fork is not dangerous. Fork is good.
So breaking the whole network infrastructure is good? Sure, let's all vote today and fork it in 28 days. If you can't update your custom implementations in that time-frame, you shouldn't even be a part of the ecosystem. All praise the amazing fork! 
Fork is an opportunity for everyone to vote.
Again, there are several proposals. The problem is that nobody sane wants them.Preventing a fork is Greg Maxwell's way to assure Blockstream will soon be forcing everyone to pay 'sidechain fees'.
This is just pure bullshit. Nobody will be forced to pay "sidechain fees". Isn't it interesting how people would sacrifice the intrinsic blockchain values inherent to Bitcoin, just in an attempt to gain a wider user-base, i.e. bigger market capitalization, i.e. more money?
seems lauda has closed his eyes and put on his blockstream nightcap again..
its not about a bigger market capitalization..
its not about more money.
its about increasing the usability.
EG reducing the fee war
EG increasing ability to spend within ~20 minutes without having to fight for priority
EG not treating third world currency weekly wages as 'spam'
EG not treating a transaction fee as 'cheap', when it amounts to more than an hours labour in third world countries
EG not tweaking bitcoin to be reliant on third party management
EG not tweaking bitcoin to not be transparent and independently checkable
EG not scaring people into false doomsdays purely to push users offchain
EG no 2mb doomsdays, then suddenly say 4mb ok.
EG no 4mb is ok but only 1.8x capacity.. because 4x capacity needs to be ignored