No, that's definitely a false statement. Bitcoin has the most advanced and developed protocol. Most of the shitcoins haven't even patched up the security exploits up until the latest versions.
I find this statement rather amusing, I hope you do realize that a clone of Bitcoin is considered not be innovative at all within the altcoin world, that should tell you something, any altcoin that is worth anything improves on Bitcoin in some way. [/quote]
Pure strawman. I was talking about security exploits, not specific features that some altcoins may or may not have.
You can joke all you want, but Bitcoin is still losing market share to the alternative cryptocurrencies and that is a fact.
I was not joking when I said mister V was behind it.I am familiar with the history of Dash, I do not consider it to fundementally undermine the currency of Dash today. I can agree that the history is "shady" but whether that effects the viability of the currency today is again an opinion.
It's not an opinion, it's a fact. We know the definition of the word 'shady' and it perfectly aligns with what happened with DRK in the first few days.This statement is just not true, at least not in the way that I suspect you mean it. I supported the ETH hard fork, and I am actually more bullish now then I was before on ETH. First of all in terms of its "immutability" and censorship resistance it is no different to Bitcoin in terms of normal blockchain transactions, it is equally immutable and censorship resistant, it is equally difficult to roll back transactions on Bitcoin compared to Ethereum, a state change to the contract layer is different to actually rolling back transactions on the blockchain.
No. The chain is not immutable, as was demonstrated with a rollback. As soon as you do this once, it sets a dangerous precedence. Please let me know if my DAO fails miserably why you won't roll back and bail me out like the Fed? Oh wait, "The DAO" was too big too fail. I wonder where we've heard that before. 
Arguably Ethereum is presently more decentralized then Bitcoin because it uses an ASIC resistant mining algorithm.
Straw man.Maybe it is best not to get into a full discussion of the pros and cons of these events and of the design of Ethereum and Bitcoin, but as proof of work blockchains their governance, and transaction immutability are actually identical on a technical level at least. So my point is that your opinion on these altcoins are an opinion and not a fact.
No. Stop defending mutable shitcoins. Monero will become illegal if it picks up, and you know this as a fact?
Yes. I can't tell you how though, since that's confidential.The transaction volume on these chains is obviously much lower, but the transactional capacity of these chains is much much higher.
I'll believe it once I see it. Until such time, these are just unbacked claims. Hint: Every-time you say "Bitcoin maximilism" to back up your arguments, you just end up looking like a fool.