Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Dangerous precedents set on March 12 2013
by
johnyj
on 17/03/2013, 01:20:18 UTC
This fork is not PLANNED, since devs did not have time to identify the cause when it happened, the only reasonable reaction at that time is a roll back, this is common sense in software upgrading procedure


The 0.8 version of the mining software adhered more closely to Satoshi's white paper than 0.7 did. They should have stuck with 0.8 for this reason alone.


I think the 0.3 version is more close to Satoshi's original design, since then lot's of improvements were made