grand scale?
theres only 6000 nodes..not 600k, not 6mill, not 6 billion... just 6000 (which only ~ 5500 are active at any one time)
The number of nodes has nothing to do with the size of the infrastructure of a singular business. They can be fine running 1 node, or even running none. In addition to that, just because Core has updated to 0.xx.xx that does not mean that a business, running a custom implementation can update within a particular time frame. theres only 6000 nodes..not 600k, not 6mill, not 6 billion... just 6000 (which only ~ 5500 are active at any one time)
and by the way, you yourself dont even know C++* and a few other languages, you have been proven to lack understanding of programming on many occasions
Pure ad hominem. While the first statement is correct, as I don't do "C++", the secondary is false. In addition to that, not knowing a programming language has nothing to do with the argument that I'm creating.here is some lessons about the 6000 nodes
1. 5700 nodes would be upgraded just to trigger the 95% benchmark
2. 300 nodes (5%) then have 2-6months to move across, to give them a little more time to vet and check the software.
This is all completely false, and useless to read. The number of nodes updating has nothing to do with HF activation parameters.1. 5700 nodes would be upgraded just to trigger the 95% benchmark
2. 300 nodes (5%) then have 2-6months to move across, to give them a little more time to vet and check the software.
i refrained from embarrassing you by quoting your admissions of lack of programming knowledge.
Said the person attempting to undermine someone's argument with pure ad hominem, in addition to lacking the same knowledge yourself. 