Bald assertion devoid of any supporting evidence is duly noted.
Fight fire-with-fire, or bald assertions-with bald-assertions when obviously reason isn't adequate.
Prove it? You can't even define it!
This is actually true. We don't even have a clear definition of 'spam', and yet some throw out the claims that blocks are filled with 'legit' transactions.
Your demonstrated pride in mastering this oh-so-advanced concept is simply adorable.
Sarcasm is pointless, and adorable is not an attribute worth pinning to this. A point has been made, and the point is correct.