Are you sure that you are not a paid shill troll?
OK, let us game this out. What exactly do you propose zimmah is shilling for, and who exactly do you propose is paying zimmah for this shilling?
My posts speak for themselves, but I would suggest that you, jbreher, are engaging in whiteknighting.... not the first time.
Well, no. Your posts do not speak for themselves. They cast aspersions, and then you scurry to avoid -- when challenged -- any detail regarding the insinuations you make.
My posts speak for themselves in that I made whatever justification I believed was needed under the particular circumstances. Accordingly, I see no need to make additional justifications or to revisit.
You can think of it as whiteknighting if you want. But you would be wrong. Your apparent target is not the subject here. Your playing fast & loose with reality is the subject.
You are jumping in to defend someone concerning my suggesting that someone could be a troll/shill, based on the content of a specific post... That post is now history, so I see no reason that I would need to justify whatever language I chose to use, unless my "apparent target" would like to respond, and it seems that such "apparent target" has, so far, not chosen to respond..
Maybe if I don't use a name?
1) What exactly do you propose [whom you accuse of shillery] is shilling for?
- and -
2) who exactly do you propose is paying [whom you accuse of shillery] for this shilling?
It does not matter. I don't any exact evidence to make a suggestion that a post is coming off as either shilling or trolling. Whether there is actually shilling or trolling going on would likely more be in the knowledge of a shill or a troll, rather than a fellow forum member (that is you, no?)
Anyhow, a lot of this seems again to be getting quite far afield from the topic of this thread, which seems to be a tendency of yours... easily distracted by me... haahahahahaha
