Re: [ANN][LTC][Pool][PPLNS] give-me-ltc.com 2% FEE [10 block confirms!]
Small thing, but on the User Stats page, the 'My Income' chart, I believe the y axis should say LTC instead of BTC, 
Unless you want to pay me that much BTC per day, I'm cool with that to... 
Unless you want to pay me that much BTC per day, I'm cool with that to... I knew about this bug and forgot to mention it in beta reports, my fault as a tester.
also, ill give you my updated list, give-me-ltc.com still number one, and when stratum arrives - it would be hard to even compare to anything else.
1. give-me-ltc.com 2% and 10 confirm only no invalids , now at 98 -2 = 96% efficiency
2. coinotron.com 2% pplpns 120 confirms + some inv , now at 96 -2 = 94% efficiency
3. litecoinpool.org 5% pps no inv , now at 98 -5 = 93% efficiency
4. coinotron.com 3.5% pps + some inv , now at 95-3.5 = 91,5% efficiency
eficiency gap - p2pool shuld me somwhere in here
5.ozcoin DGM 2% + lots of invalid rejects and slowdowns of hashrate [not enough work], that bad for gpu's! around 87% efficiency
6.notroll.in 4% + lots of invalid rejects and slowdowns of hashrate [not enough work], that bad for gpu's! around 85% efficiency
7.ozcoin pps 4% + lots of invalid rejects and slowdowns of hashrate [not enough work], that bad for gpu's! around 85% efficiency
8.burnside 0% + oh s**t! stales and invalids rejects [20 - 100%] around 75% efficiency
its of course on my connection from europe, but i easlyt found many other's had similar experience.
i also experienced high rejects at LTCMine.ru , but that one i couldn't confirm that others had the same problem so i do not want to put them here before i can see I'm not the only one. LTCMine.ru is stratum-only pps with 3% and would be on place 6 after ozcoin dgm.
also tested everything in here https://github.com/litecoin-project/litecoin/wiki/Comparison-of-mining-pools but not found anything worth mentioning.