I am wondering if the sale of coins on an exchange could cause the share of the person to be less in the end because they are also splitting the conversion cost?
Makes sense for that kind of coding mistake to happen because they are trying to make everything an equal split in the end.
I think that totally makes sense why a solo mined coin to payout type can end up being less in the end. The block reward was split after the remainder was to sold on the exchange. Sale fees, etc..... Since value and fees are unknown till sold...
anyone else see my flow of thought?
i am trying to follow the code, but it looks like what i said is right.
it uses btc as a constant.. not sure but all coins might get sent to exchange.. not sure if they get sold or not tho..
they get assigned a value and that value ,im assuming after fees, is used to adjust your balance..
so say you were solo mining a coin, you got 5 blocks and it was 50 coins.. they get sent to an exchange when they mature, and you end up with x amount of btc. when payouts come around, they get revalued back to solo coin and you end up with 40.
Most of this discussion assumes a mined coin is exchanged for the payout coin. The 20% reduction also occurs when the matured block
is the same currency as payout. In such cases there is no exchange. There's no use adding unnecessary variables to the problem.
I wish you success in finding the problem.