At one point you said this is all "proven". Previously you said it was rare for anyone to know anything. Which is it? YOu basically give credibility to the paper I posted. You guys have huge cognitive biases because of your political views which unfortunately prevent you from looking at things logically. You can look all around and see direct evidence of the earth warming at a rate far greater than anything in man's history. Maybe not in your backyard... but.. it doesn't take much.
Ironically, I'm coming around to 'your way of thinking.'
As I've 'proven' to a significant degree, evil humans burning fossil fuel has nearly zero to do with it. OTOH, an idea which I initially rejected, is that geo-engineering could have some impact on global temperatures. It is increasingly obvious that it can have wide-scale impacts on 'climate', and with certain feedbacks, an impact on global temperatures also seem plausible. Don't take my word for it. NOAA has already admitted that there is 'accidental' geo-engineering due to commercial aircraft, and CIA director (and former communist voter) Brennan is pretty ga-ga about the idea of using geo-engineering as an inexpensive irrigation system servicing chosen entities (and, presumably, dis-servicing others.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCP4x9dVvE4What really spurred my interest in geo-engineering was my own eyes looking into the sky above my own home. As little as three years ago I nearly completely wrote it off as a wild conspiracy theory.
I entertain the hypothesis that the 'anthropogenic climate change' fraud as couched by the likes of you guys is as much as anything about trying to produce justification for weather modification. Of course that is not to say that the promoters (like yourself) would have the foggiest clue that that is the real game.