I think Trump has a far better understanding of economical matters than any of the other candidates. He is not as intermingled with the financial establishment as the Clinton clan, that's why he talks more factually. His assessment of the US economy is correct - the cheap money from central banks coupled with low interest rates is not helping the real economy, its just creating another asset bubble.

What remains to be seen is if Trump is able to offer a real solution to the problem in case he is elected. I think that's questionable. On the other hand what Hillary does is more of the same, cementing the status quo from which she and her clan can drain more wealth and power. So voting for Trump leaves at least a tiny chance of positive change, while voting for Hillary guarantees a continuation of the downturn.

In the end I think it's up to the people. We all should vote with our feet and buy Bitcoin. So the central bank and debt problem is at least solved on an individual level...

ya.ya.yo!