Well, as i mentionned above, each member of the team recording a video, presenting himself, showing papers proving who he is.
Give to your investors the possibility to cause you real problems if you scam and run away. This is how i can trust you for real, supporting Inchain and not investing only a few pennies in the project.
Not a single investor would have the possibility to cause problem to a team which did the job, and finally failed, but still have been honest and transparent.
Inchain is far different from other projects, and may last years, if it fits to conjuncture, business evolution, keep going under a reasonable management.
Many legit projects didn't see their team loosing anonymity, they finally all paid the price... a crazy project not meeting the success it should have had, a failed ICO not gathering enough of funds to keep the project running...
Inchain is different, that's i guess going up to that step shouldn't be a problem.
I really wish Inchain team will be transparent, for the project to be successful and solving a large problem existing in this sphere.
Ok, I will discuss it with other team members.
Just remember any questions are welcomed.
Hi,
Did Inchain team eventually decided to loose anonymity?
Such a video would give credibility your projects, and it might also be useful to give your version of Elephant mess up.
You even may go further with some kind of questions/answer stream.
He did give his versoin here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1623519.msg16390344#msg16390344But hosting a live Q&A is always a good move.
As we explained before we have not been involved in this Elephant scam and are not responsible for this.
We have nothing to hide. If you have any questions regarding this matter, we invite you to join our QA session taking place in our slack group on Friday 5pm BST.
See you in #q_a channel.
Slack registration link:
slack.inchain.ioIf you already registered:
inchain.slack.comMy post was mainly about revealing their identity to their potential investors in the forms mentionned.
Still waiting an answer BTW.
We can make a video call in Skype with you. PM me if is it OK for you.
My video in progress
Thanks for your skype call proposition, despite i would prefer something public, i may accept it.
Some news about your video?
I hope it well finished next week
Just a thought.
1) Inchain insurance service is destined to people keeping their coins on the different exchanges.
Also, how will Inchain success? It makes sense that only those people will have an interest by being insured, and that people who don't do this won't need this insurance. Moreover, considering the few amount of "legit" exchanges, when a sinister will happen,we can imagine that a large part of the people Inchain insured will ask for their part, for what they paid.
We all know that insurance companies are in hard troubles when too many people ask at the same time for their compensation.
How will Inchain handle this?
2) What would prevent somebody to create an exchange, keep it running for some time to make it "legit" in Inchain point of view, and then put all his coins on the its own exchange with many different accounts, take Inchain insurance, scam/close his exchanges ( he also necessarly still have his coins) and then ask Inchain for his compensation with each account?