because a hard fork is not just one thing. its people like you who unconvincingly try to brush stuff under the rug and treat it all as a disaster.
controversial vs consensus
accidental vs intentional.
So after a redundant analogy, you resort to ad hominem? controversial vs consensus
accidental vs intentional.
People who have kept a close eye on your posts and who are decent with Bitcoin knows that what you're preaching is usually very wrong. The fork debate has been beaten to death, and you've provided no good reasoning for it.also unlike yourself who avoid learning, some people want to learn.
You've pretty much described yourself. How about you stop attacking other people and start listening for once?