DooMAD, you're better than most but you don't totally get it either.
left-libertarianism,
This is what former left-wingers sometimes say when they switch to libertarianism. They can't cope psychologically with the idea that
anything right-wing makes sense, so they have to redefine their stance as "only the left part". This ignores the point of libertarianism: taking the good aspects of the right, and the good aspects of the left, thus rendering the dividing line null and void.
To come into libertarianism trying to re-establish the useless left-right dividing line can only be interpreted as either foolishness or intended to disrupt or divide libertarians.
syndicalism, statism, anarchism and socialism that all differ to communism in different ways.
Syndicalism = communist wolves in anarchist sheepskins. 5 minutes of anarchy, so we can set up the "correct" form of statism. I'd recommend not using the Syndicalist term if you wish to be taken seriously.
To further muddy the waters,
Indeed, why stop there when you could make it sound even more incoherent, lol
But know also that protectionism is, without exception, an authoritarian concept. There should be no central entity enforcing barriers to what should be a free and open market. No one should be trying to tell anyone else what code they can and can't run. It's a matter of personal freedom.
And this is where you descend into outright nonsense.
Individuals have every right to dictate who can use assets that belong to them. It's called property rights, and yes, it involves protecting your rightful possessions. Freedom is not the freedom to steal. And you've been advocating strongly for theft elsewhere on bitcointalk.org.